From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
The ACPI handle of struct i2c_adapter's dev member should not be
set, because this causes that struct i2c_adapter to be associated
with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the
second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during
the registration of struct i2c_adapter). Consequently,
acpi_i2c_register_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the
parent of the struct i2c_adapter it is called for rather than the
struct i2c_adapter's ACPI handle (which should be NULL).
Make that happen and modify the i2c-designware-platdrv driver,
which currently is the only driver for ACPI-enumerated I2C
controller chips, not to set the ACPI handle for the
struct i2c_adapter it creates.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c | 2 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void acpi_i2c_register_devices(struct i2
acpi_handle handle;
acpi_status status;
- handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&adapter->dev);
+ handle = ACPI_HANDLE(adapter->dev.parent);
if (!handle)
return;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static int dw_i2c_probe(struct platform_
adap->algo = &i2c_dw_algo;
adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
- ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&adap->dev, ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev));
r = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(adap);
if (r) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
