On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/30/2010 09:36 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> So, to sum up: >>>> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >>>> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >>>> >>>> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >>>> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>>> >>>> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >>>> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>>> >>>> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >>>> >>>> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >>>> >>>> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 >>> >>> I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on >>> that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and >>> see if it mentions ACPI.) >> >> Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. > > Any ideas here, please? Is there anything what I might try? I'd suggest opening a report on kernel.org bugzilla under ACPI and attach the acpidump output.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
