On 08/30/2010 09:36 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> So, to sum up: >>> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >>> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >>> >>> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >>> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>> >>> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >>> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>> >>> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >>> >>> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >>> >>> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 >> >> I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on >> that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and >> see if it mentions ACPI.) > > Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. Any ideas here, please? Is there anything what I might try? thanks, -- js -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
