On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So, to sum up: >> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >> >> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >> >> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >> >> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >> >> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >> >> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 > > I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on > that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and > see if it mentions ACPI.) Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
