Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I still no point in comparing this to Windows' setup. We can't find out
>>> whether it is quirked or better (without some bug) handled there.
>>
>> Well, you can see if Windows shows IRQ 10 or 11 for that device..
>
> But how can I find out which link it is routed to in Windows? Without
> that information the number is meaningless, no?

If you look at the pattern of which IRQs are shared by what devices in
Linux and compare it to Windows you can get a good idea. Normally the
assignment of devices to interrupt lines is hard-wired on the
motherboard and doesn't change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux