On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:32:19AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Well... should we only do it in 'platform' hibernation mode? There are > > > machines that predate windows/acpi and still should hibernate. > > > > If they predate acpi then they won't declare any NVS regions. > > What if they're ACPI and APM capable, and in APM mode? Would the code need > to guard against that? I can't imagine any case where that would cause problems, but if it does then it's an easy fix. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
