Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > To be honest, I just want to get some feedback on this.
> > > This was major issue that kept me from using otherwise prefect suspend
> > > to ram.
> > 
> > I think this is a change we should try, but there is a chance it will break
> > some systems.
> I doubt that. BIOSes are tested against windows, and since it has this
> behavior, all systems this patch could break wouldn't work in windows
> ether.
> 
> I was doing all kinds of attempts to fix this bug, and finally I found
> the cause for it.

Well... should we only do it in 'platform' hibernation mode? There are
machines that predate windows/acpi and still should hibernate.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux