Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Well... should we only do it in 'platform' hibernation mode? There are
> > machines that predate windows/acpi and still should hibernate.
> 
> If they predate acpi then they won't declare any NVS regions.

What if they're ACPI and APM capable, and in APM mode?  Would the code need
to guard against that?

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux