On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > My concern with this is that until we know where we deviate from the > Windows behaviour, we don't know what strings we'd need to provide. And > once we *do* know where we deviate, we should fix that deviation rather > than provide an identifying string. IMO we should "fix" deviations *only* when it makes sense to do so (I bet at least one of the deviations we are going to find will be so hideously wrong and ugly when compared to the Right Thing, that we will be at a very unconfortable position if we need to implement it). We better reserve judgment of what deviations we should be fixing or not for when we find them in the first place. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
