Re: Kernel Version specific vendor override possibilities needed - Revert and provide osi=linux or provide a replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It doesn't punish them. They're the ones who are going to work with us 
> to ensure that Linux works on their hardware, and their needs are going 

And since when we have to work exactly like Windows (whatever version) does
in THAT case?

Also, why would one thing (proper replacement for OSI(Linux)) cause any sort
of difference over the other (trying to be bug-to-bug compatible with
Microsoft crap).

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux