On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 00:13 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > It doesn't punish them. They're the ones who are going to work with us > > to ensure that Linux works on their hardware, and their needs are going > > And since when we have to work exactly like Windows (whatever version) does > in THAT case? > > Also, why would one thing (proper replacement for OSI(Linux)) cause any sort > of difference over the other (trying to be bug-to-bug compatible with > Microsoft crap). > I agree with Henrique. Since we have, in fact, more Windows cases than Linux cases and for Linux, just announce that is recommended, osi=linux. Also it is possible put Linuxs bios in a kind of white-list in kernel code ... -- Sérgio M. B.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature