Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Hmm, perhaps we should introduce a CONFIG_SUSPEND and change
> CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND into CONFIG_HIBERNATION, both depending on
> CONFIG_PM?
> 
> There's quite some code needed only for suspend compiled in when CONFIG_PM is
> set ...

Sounds like a good idea, although I suspect that CONFIG_PM really *is* 
fairly close to CONFIG_SUSPEND. The thing is, all the stuff it enabled is 
largely useless without at least STR.

(Yes, I realize that you can do per-driver suspend events etc, but I 
suspect not a lot of people have used it).

But from a logical standpoint, it does make sense to have a separate 
config option for the STR support.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux