On Thursday, 26 July 2007 19:45, Len Brown wrote: > On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:55, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > > > > > Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs > > > of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option. > > > > Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND > > and STR? > > CONFIG_STR doesn't exist. Hmm, perhaps we should introduce a CONFIG_SUSPEND and change CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND into CONFIG_HIBERNATION, both depending on CONFIG_PM? There's quite some code needed only for suspend compiled in when CONFIG_PM is set ... Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
