On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs > of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option. Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND and STR? > If you feel that your system has been degraded > because it now includes what used to be excluded under > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n, please let me know how. I feel that I get asked to include a feature that (a) I have no interest in on that machine (b) I didn't need to include before. What was the advantage? And what was it that caused something like this to be a post-rc1 thing. That makes me really unhappy. This is a *regression*. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
