Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] CONFIG_IBM_BAY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> Userspace wants to (non-force-)-unmount by itself after (1), so it can
> stop  the eject process if the filesystems cannot be cleanly
> unmounted. So the force-unmount at (3) ends up being a redundant
> safety measure at best.

More like it is a "make sure we can actually eject, as we have been told
to".  We might return an error instead, but if we do, we need a way to
force-eject (e.g. echo 2 >eject).

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux