On 3/19/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote: > Userspace wants to (non-force-)-unmount by itself after (1), so it can > stop the eject process if the filesystems cannot be cleanly > unmounted. So the force-unmount at (3) ends up being a redundant > safety measure at best. More like it is a "make sure we can actually eject, as we have been told to". We might return an error instead, but if we do, we need a way to force-eject (e.g. echo 2 >eject).
Which stage are you referring to? Note that the only way to check if you can unmount is to actually do so. Otherwise, you're very likely to run into race conditions with someone accessing the filesystem between the check and the actual unmount. Shem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
