Re: Joe Philbrook, USA Xubuntu Karmic 2.6.31-21-generic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe,

If you won't mind a bit of work, I would try to build the
slmodemd(alsa driver) on your own machine.  That means incorporating
32 bit devel libraries/packages

Download:
http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/smartlink/slmodem-2.9.11-20100303.tar.gz

and copy it to your linux partition/home directory and extract it
$ tar -zxvf slmodem-2.9.11-20100303.tar.gz
$ cd slmodem-2.9.11-20100303
$ cd modem
$ make ALSA_SUPPORT=1

it might fail like things like stubbs.gnu.32 files are missing and try
to build it, or you may also download SLMODEMD.gcc4.3.tar.gz without
ALSA extension.  Copy it over the other slmodemd(rename the previous
slmodemd to slmodemd.old) and try the new one.  Report back presently
to list .

Regards,

Antonio



On 4/30/10, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It would appear that on Apr 30, Antonio Olivares did say:
>
>> To: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.linmodem
>> Message-ID:
>> <h2w75107331004300110z322cf05eqb48db8d7e1b1f3ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> From: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:10:09 +0000
>> In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004291622200.3503@XubuntuMe2010>
>> Subject: Re: Joe Philbrook, USA Xubuntu Karmic 2.6.31-21-generic
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>> with the ModemData.txt that you  have attached, it seems to me that
>> you are still running in 64bit mode.
>>
>> You may read:
>>
>> http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/bigarch/archive-seventh/msg03119.html
>>
>> to get details as to how to get it working by installing several
>> programs needed and how to proceed.  Try to read the above page and if
>> for some reason, it still does not work, please write back.  Are you
>> using SLMODEMD.gcc4.3-alsa-1.20.tar.gz?
>
> Thank you for responding Antonio, I had previously seen that link in
> one of my scroogle searches... But I wasn't sure how much of it applied
> because it was talking Kubuntu 7.10 & I'm using Xubuntu 9.10, Also it
> listed a slightly different vendor id 0x10573055 vs. 0x10573057.
>
> But in any case Since you pointed it out to me I tried to follow its
> advice. First I ensured lib32asound2 was installed
>
> UnderTree =-> apt-get install lib32asound2
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> lib32asound2 is already the newest version.
> lib32asound2 set to manually installed.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> UnderTree =->
>
> Then I checked the slmodemd version
>
> UnderTree =-> slmodemd --version
> SmartLink Soft Modem: version 2.9.11 Feb  1 2010 19:59:11
> UnderTree =->
>
> Then since that hadn't been working, I opened synaptic and searched for the
> Ubuntu package name of "sl-modem-daemon"... Found and installed it!
>
> Then:
> UnderTree =-> slmodemd --version
> SmartLink Soft Modem: version 2.9.11 Sep 14 2009 00:38:05
> UnderTree =->
>
> Now I get the same half way there results as before without needing to
> manually run slmodemd any more. In fact I can't if I wanted to now:
>
> UnderTree =-> slmodemd -c USA --alsa hw:0,6
> error: alsa setup: cannot open playback device 'hw:0,6': Device or resource
> busy
> error: cannot setup device `hw:0,6'
>
> Previously wvdialconf had detected the modem because I'd had the above
> slmodemd command running in another terminal. Just the same way as I'd had
> it running before I'd run wvdial itself.
>
> Now wvdial dials out on the modem without taking that step...
>
> But just like before, it's as if the modem was a send only device, because
> I can empirically test that it is in fact dialing up the (dialup ISP). But
> it's not hearing either the carrier nor the attempted handshake from the
> ISP's modem...
>
> I thought I'd try a different dialer to see if the problem was wvdial
> itself... But searching karmic's available dialers via synaptic (search for
> 'ppp')
> didn't offer many actual dialers. The gnome offering says it uses wvdial
> as a back end. So I can't see bothering with that just to get a GUI
> interface when I prefer TUI interfaces anyway... I don't really want dial
> on demand anyway. I want dial (and hangup) when 'commanded' so that pretty
> much leaves pppconfig/pon/poff & kppp
>
> UnderTree =-> plog -23
> Apr 30 10:23:06 XubuntuMe2010 pppd[2406]: pppd 2.4.5 started by root, uid 0
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (BUSY)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (VOICE)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (NO DIAL TONE)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (NO ANSWER)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: abort on (DELAYED)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: send (ATZ Q0 V1 E1 S0=0 X3 &C0 &D2
> +FCLASS=0^M)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: expect (OK)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: ATZ Q0 V1 E1 S0=0 X3 &C0 &D2
> +FCLASS=0^M^M
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: OK
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]:  -- got it
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: send (ATDT7340102^M)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: expect (CONNECT)
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: ^M
> Apr 30 10:23:07 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: ATDT7340102^M^M
> Apr 30 10:23:30 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: NO CARRIER
> Apr 30 10:23:30 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]:  -- failed
> Apr 30 10:23:30 XubuntuMe2010 chat[2409]: Failed (NO CARRIER)
> Apr 30 10:23:30 XubuntuMe2010 pppd[2406]: Script /usr/sbin/chat -v -f
> /etc/chatscripts/provider finished (pid 2408), status = 0x5
> Apr 30 10:23:30 XubuntuMe2010 pppd[2406]: Connect script failed
> Apr 30 10:23:31 XubuntuMe2010 pppd[2406]: Exit.
> UnderTree =->
>
> If you tell me that kppp is likely to do better then I'll clutter up
> my XFCE/E17 Karmic installation with it's kde4 dependencies. But I
> don't really think the problem is wvdial, when I'm getting the same
> results with pom...
>
> But frankly I don't have a clue what else to try... do you?
>
> --
> |    ~-~   ~-~       Guess I just don't know.
> |    <?>   <?>     Joseph (the Wordy) Philbrook
> |        ^                  J(tWdy)P
> |       ___             <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>
>
>        <sigh>
>
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Development]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Fedora Women]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux