Re: Compiling support for AGRSM 0x11c11040 - Fedora 9 - kernel 2.6.26.5-45

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi isamar,

my latest sources are at http://linux.zsolttech.com/linmodem/agrsm/Testing/
grab the dkms-agrsm<nice version>.rpm
if dkms is your friend install it with rpm -ivh
if you dont use dkms
with rpm -ivh --nodeps --noscripts --force

if you not use dkms:
go to /usr/src/agrsm-<version>/
apply patches:
patch -p1 <  patches/essentials.patch
patch -p1 <  patches/a_14_16.patch
patch -p1 <  patches/a_16_18.patch
go after into your kernelsrc-dir and do
make oldconfig ; make prepare ; make scripts ; make
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/agrsm-2.1.80-<installed version>mdv2009.0 modules
and copy the builded modules to your
/lib/modules/<kern-version>/kernel/drivers/serial/

pls report success/fail

zsolt


> Zsolt,
>
> I am not worried here with the package management.
> Just need the source code and to make it work. Maybe,
> with this working, I can help uploading Fedora 9's RPM package for
> whoever needs that.
>
> Well, I gave up to keep the old kernel and now I am using the newest
> Fedora 9's Kernel,
>  2.6.27.24-78.2.53.fc9.i686
>
> With this kernel version, my "SiS Azalia" sound card is working very
> well and then I don't need
> to use that workaround with alsa 1.0.19 package anymore.
>
> I am using now the sources from the package agrsm-2.1.80-7mdv2009.0.tar.gz
> I got that from http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/ltmodem/11c11040/
> BTW, do you have the source package for agrsm-2.1.80-8 ?
>
> Now, my current status is:
>
> 1) I load agrmodem.ko    OK
> 2) I load agrserial.ko         OK
> 3) I load minicom               OK
> 4) But, when I send any commando to the modem like "ATDT<somenumber>",
> the machine freezes at all.
>
> In the same machine there is a "Atheros WIFI AR2425 chip"  sharing IRQ
> with the modem.
>
> Lemme know if there is any dump or log I can send you to help on that.
>
> Thanks for now.
>
> Isamar
>
>
> 2009/6/13 Zsolt BÃ?RCZES <zsolt@xxxxxx>:
>> hi isamar,
>>
>> the problem is the package managemant, standard kernel shiped with an
>> alsa
>> version -> we can easy make a patch and dkms can handle it according the
>> kernel version.
>>
>> if somebody is beginning to use a different version there are different
>> questions to handle:
>> 1. shure he/she use the alsa modules as he/she think? (sometimes modules
>> are not correct installed)
>> 2. are the alsa sources in the kernel source (patched kernel install)
>> 3. WHERE are the alsa sources installed if outside of kernel tree.
>>
>> i just can say, use the alsa version shipped with your kernels sources
>> :-)
>>
>> zsolt
>>
>>> Zsolt,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your attention.
>>>
>>> I am thinking to go to a newer kernel version and more specifically
>>> kernel-2.6.27.24-78.2.53.fc9.i686.
>>> Any chances to make it working easily with this kernel and alsa 1.0.19
>>> ?
>>> Or ALSA 1.0.19 should be problem as well ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Isamar
...

--
Diese Nachricht wurde auf Viren und andere gefährliche Inhalte untersucht
und ist - aktuelle Virenscanner vorausgesetzt - sauber.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.ZsoltTech.Com


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Development]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Fedora Women]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux