Antonio thanks, but Hefri's message revealed a display bug which I've just fixed. The proper response for 11c11040 chips is follow http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/bigarch/archive-eighth/msg03863.html agrsm-20080203a.tar.gz at http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/ltmodem/sv92/ is appropriate to the 11c1:0620 and 11c1:048c/f chipsets. I'll send the scanModem update shorytly MarvS On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hefri, > > scanModem reports that you need agrsm package: > > Support type needed or chipset: agrsm > > Use agrsm-20080203a.tar.gz at > http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/ltmodem/sv92/ > Read Modem/DOCs/Agrsm.txt > > However a package with "a" at the end of 3a.tar.gz does not exist, the > closest match is the following: > > http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/ltmodem/sv92/agrsm-20080203.tar.gz > > Carefully read the how to > http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/ltmodem/sv92/agrsm_howto.txt > > also take note, of the following reported by scanModem: > > Modem interrupt assignment and sharing: > 17: 30 4486 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb1, HDA Intel > --- Bootup diagnostics for card in PCI slot 00:07.0 ---- > [ 27.501032] pci 0000:00:07.0: Enabling HT MSI Mapping > [ 43.381586] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:07.0[A] -> Link [LAZA] -> > GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 > [ 43.381608] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:07.0 to 64 > [ 44.448920] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:07:00.0[A] -> Link [LK3E] -> > GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 > [ 44.448931] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:07:00.0 to 64 > [ 44.476772] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:07:00.0 disabled > > The PCI slot 00:07.0 of the modem card may be disabled early in > a bootup process, but then enabled later. If modem drivers load > but the modem is not responsive, read DOCs/Bootup.txt about possible fixes. > Send dmesg.txt along with ModemData.txt to discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > if help is needed. > > Regards, > > Antonio > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Hefri Mardi <hefrimardi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >
