On 06/07/19 07:36, Uwe Brauer wrote: > >> On 05/07/19 13:14, Uwe Brauer wrote: > >> And all I am saying is that the feature you describe sounds to me >> NOTHING LIKE reveal codes, and personally I can't see any use for it. >> The Word equivalent is "show formatting" which - like I said - was >> ignored by lusers and power users alike because they couldn't see any >> use for it. > > My motivation was partiall caused by a MS Word document, which I had to > edit and the mark up was distorted by LO (most likely this file was > written 15 ago and then saved in different formats). So I hoped a reveal > code feature would help to understand what is the problem and where. Sonething I heard years ago when comparing Word and WordPerfect ... when working with Word, what you're supposed to do is type the text in, then go back and format it. When working with WordPerfect, you're supposed to hint to the program what the text is (sounds like styles to me), and let WordPerfect format it for you. So if you've got a Word document giving you grief, sounds like the best thing is to "save as text", and then just start again with the layout. > >> Do you know lilypond and frescobaldi? > > I am using LaTeX on a daily basis (with GNU Emacs) and use LO and > friends only on certain occasions. So you don't have to convince me on that. > I'd rather use a modern word processor (so I can share documents with lusers) that doesn't force me to work in "luser mode". That was why WordPerfect doubled its market share in the early 90s (20% to 40% in about 3 years) before MS pulled its dirty tricks campaign and killed it. An example of the difference between the two companies ... users wanted labels. The WordPerfect guys said "what actually is the functionality here - users want a *logical* page which is a label, and lots of them on a *physical* page which is your Avery sheet. So that's what they did, they separated the physical from the logical, and provided a "quick-n-easy" configuration helper so you could just pull in the correct setting, or create your own. Next minute, people were using this to create A5 logical pages on A4 physical and printing off booklets. MS created a labels wizard, and then then created a booklet wizard (both of which I hate, because they are luser tools that force me to do what MS thinks I want rather than what I think I want). Okay, WordPerfect then created a booklet wizard that took all the printing hassle away, but the difference is that WP *helped* you, while MS said "this is the way you have to do it". Plus I'm a *text* guy. MS is very much a *visual* company (as are most people, actually). So the MS way of doing things is alien to me - the WP way of "here's a gui, this drops into the text setup behind it" is just *so* *easy*. Another little thing (that illustrates this) is "hidden text". MS thought they would add the "comments" feature, but yet again it's a pale imitation that is a *useless* copy. Keeping a quiz sheet and an answer sheet in sync is a pain in the neck, isn't it? Not in WordPerfect it isn't!!! You just create your answer sheet, adding the attribute "hidden text" to all your answers - just like the attributes "bold" or "italic" or whatever. And in the "View" menu is a check-box "show hidden text". If that's ticked, all the hidden text behaves exactly like normal text. If it's unticked, it all disappears into a markup box. So you just print the same document twice, once in each mode, and there's your quiz sheet you hand out, and your answer sheet for you to give them out at the end. I'd LOVE to have that in LO, too. But without reveal codes, how are you going to get it to work? Because how are you going to show hidden text in your wysiwyg window because if the box isn't ticked there's nowhere to show it? I use Writer because I hate it less than Word. But both of them share the same visual outlook on life, which I want to get away from ... Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice