On 12/5/05, Peter Surda <surda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:42:09 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kalmer@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > >Guys > Hi, > > >Sharing a link between 200 users > Been there, done that (1400 users even). > > >-= WRR =- > >My favourite, but with the most disappointment at the moment... I can > >see the weights are adjusted, and our trials have shown that the link > >gets shared equally. However, in implementation it doesn't work that > >way. The abusers can still go mad, and now at link capacity (X), no > >longer at Z. This has caused some serious problems for non-abusive > >users. > You probably need to use bigger incr and decr in wrr. Check out shurdix' tc > script: http://docs.shurdix.org/shurdix:learn , it calculates the parameters > automatically, you only need to set incoming and outgoing bandwidth. Hmm, hacked it up so much that I can bearly recognize it... IIRC you had two variables, one tfor the time it takes to go from MAX to MIN, and another for the opposite. I changed them so that the MAX to MIN will now be 15 seconds, and the later 450 seconds. Did I miss the plot here? We can't tolerate abuse around here... > >Kenneth Kalmer > >kenneth.kalmer@xxxxxxxxx > Yours sincerely, > Peter Best -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@xxxxxxxxx Folding@home stats http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&username=kenneth%2Ekalmer _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
