UF. Sorry. I answered stupidly to your email. You replied about the Julian's patches... I've sent a big amount of email, and not only about a single configuration. I don't know why, but now the patches work. I swear I haven't changed anything in my configuration; simply, after rebooting, some minutes without changing anything, everything worked. Strange, strange. So, it works. Thanks! - Wow, I've learnt a lot about netfilter and policy routing... On 7/6/05, Lluís Batlle <viriketo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/6/05, Vinay <vinayamar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I had 3 cards, eth0 and eth1 connecting to 2 isps and eth2 > > connecting to lan. First i setup the address configuration for these > > cards without the gateway option. So i specified only Ip address and > > netmask. Then i gave the masquerade option for both the network cards > > and made necessary chnages in the firewall. Next I executed the > > script which i got from > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q4/010372.html. After > > running the script the system was using both the connections . But > > since i hadnt use the patch, it was not able to detect the dead > > gateway. So if one of the link goes down, it creates problem. > I tried that way, and routing works _only for local connections_. It > doesn't work for NAT connections. So, the result is the same, as the > configuration I was trying is the same, which is set in the script you > gave. :) > > > > > Can u please explain how u have applied the patch . > I have not applied the patch in the configuration I'm trying to get > working :) So, by now, I don't use that patch. I explain howI think > the multipath routing + NAT doesn't work, in a mail I just sent. :) > But as there I explained how I understand that nothing may work > without patches (in the mail sent to the list, before this one), I'll > start trying with the patches applied. I applied them to a vanilla > kernel by: > cd /usr/src/linux > patch -p1 < the_patch.diff > > This results in changing some files, as expected. So the patching > should be well done. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
