Trying the configuration in nano.txt

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

(I sent other mails some time ago, about not-using the Julian's patches).

When I try the configuration from Nano.txt, having the Julian's
patches applied, only the first 'hop' of the routing table "222" is
used (according to tables shown in Nano.txt).

I saw that this question was asked some time ago, with no answer.
Maybe someone can tell me the solution? The routing policy
rules/tables are the same, as I sent in my last email, but with this
table 222:
default  proto static 
        nexthop via 192.168.16.2  dev eth1 weight 1
        nexthop via 192.168.17.2  dev eth2 weight 1

Even trying lots of "ip route get x.x.x.x", always the first hop is chosen.

Everything is written according to Nano.txt (I think :).

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux