Ludek Horak wrote:
What do you think about this configuration? Do you know better setting for gaming traffic on share connection line? I'd like to know your opinions. I'm appreciating your comments.
I wouldn't send interactive type traffic to sfq - perturb causes packet reordering, it's meant for bulk traffic really.
I would make one class for all interactive types and give it a much higher rate rather than spliting into game, ping, ssh etc and having low rates for each.
Are the 2/2 and 4/4 internet link - you are OK for bandwidth on wireless?
Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
