Re: HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some coincidence?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



pljosh wrote:
I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the lower handle class.

I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic setups and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and CPU usage and you say it gets better with more classes.

Andy.


Well - you had 5-8% while I noticed 50-80% difference! (user1 ~76kB/s and user3 ~45kB/s).

I did notice on the graph I looked at, that it was a bit higher - I only tested with wget. I was going to repeat properly and if you were still higher suggest that you set quantums to mtu, low bursts and set


HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c.

I also have esfq attached to classes


Of course - as you can see on the graph I created: with more classes difference beteween u1&u3 is smaller...

Hmm I only have 2+default shared by IP - but two more "above".



Can you send me the script you used for your test which gave you only 5-8%? Maybe there is something wrong with the one of mine?

OK but it won't work for you - I guess. It needs connbytes a hacked IMQ and esfq. It's just a test evolved from digriz script really.


I also have half your bandwidth - and it was set at 400kbit for the test.

Andy.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux