Patrick McHardy wrote: > I've completed the port and tested it yesterday, unfortunately it's > not useable in the real world as is. There is a strong bias against > non-ECN flows because their packets are simply dropped instead of > marked. At high load (50 ECN vs. 1 non-ECN flow) and a marking > probability of about 10% the non-ECN flow simply stalls. > I can send you the patch if you're interested .. Thank you, I am really interested. I will try how it behaves for me in various circumstances. What you say, though, is probably true - and the situation is even more accentuated when considering that different TCP stacks react to ECN and packet drops differently - a single drop percent will not be enough. Which ofcourse brings us to SFB - with Stochastic Fair Blue, the drop percentage for the non-ECN flow should be significantly lower and the connections should transfer more or less fairly. -- Naked _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
