> I have read about people having lots of problems with IMQ. So I just wanted to > try it and see how stable it is on my box. I gather it could actually > be problems with the Kernel and not the IMQ code?? > That is possible but prpbably not because of bug in kernel I as I think it is because kernel handles local trafic diferently than forwarded so you cant use imq to shape trafic generated by server I am comtinuing development of imq abd I face this problem most of the time. > I think that sounds even more messy :-) > I only wanted to ingress shape with IMQ to ensure that I don't drop UDP > or small TCP ACK packets for upload streams. I guess I will just give > up on the idea and using ingress policing... Its not so important anyway as my > DSL connection is very asymetric (2mbit D/L; 256kbit U/L) and upload > shaping is more important. > if only want to shape incoming trafic probably you can use imq quite safely, anyway as I see you dont need it at all you can easily shape all uploads anyway and since your download speed is high enough you dont need to worry about it. however imq can be usefull to control trafic so that you can download with kaza and browse web or play game without high latency. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
