Hi Roy, Thanks for getting back to me so promptly. > Imq is very invasive componemt which requires to recompile almost everyhing > this diver is very unstable and will crash for sure, sooner or later > depending on load. I have read about people having lots of problems with IMQ. So I just wanted to try it and see how stable it is on my box. I gather it could actually be problems with the Kernel and not the IMQ code?? > I sugest you to leave iptables alone and just modify imq.c source to catch > what you need. > ir you dont have too much trafic it may not crash for all day. ( if you will > use it for download shaping) I think that sounds even more messy :-) I only wanted to ingress shape with IMQ to ensure that I don't drop UDP or small TCP ACK packets for upload streams. I guess I will just give up on the idea and using ingress policing... Its not so important anyway as my DSL connection is very asymetric (2mbit D/L & 256kbit U/L) and upload shaping is more important. Even if IMQ is fixed in kernel 2.6 (is it??) I won't be able to use it until I can update the driver for my conexant PCI ADSL modem (which works fine just now under kernel 2.4.22).... -- Best regards, Robert _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
