On Wednesday 03 September 2003 06:59, Nimit Gupta wrote:
> Yeah its for a short period but it keeps happening, I mean it will reach
> to 48Kbit and then after few sec it will stablize at 24Kbit then again
> it will reach to 48 and this repeats.
>
> can you explain how to calculate burst rates for better control and
> accuracy?
Mhh. How long is it stayig at 48Kbit? Can you plot it?
> >>>In order for you to control
> >>>latency and bandwidth use, you must ensure that you are the slowest
> >>>point. Annoyingly, the only successful way to identify exactly what
> >>> speed to use as a bandwidth cap is experimentation. A good general
> >>> suggestion is to lop off a couple of kbit and try capping your
> >>> bandwidth exactly as Stef suggests. Try using 188kbit, and see if your
> >>> apparent control increases.
> >>
> >>Is there a ratio between the total available bandwidth and the amount
> >>you restrict it to or you can just arbitarily reduce by 5-7 Kbit.
> >
> > It should be quite accurate. I tested it for different rates / ceils and
> > each time the results where allmost perfect.
>
> So I want to know what ratio it is as you said for 192Kbit make 188Kbit
> thats equivalent to 2 percent, is this the way.
It's not so easy to tell. Sometimes, people lower the total bandwidth and
suddenly the shaping is working.
> One more thing, Is there something like isolated(as in cbq) in htb, that
> is irrespective of others demand the bandwidth allocated to someone as
> isolated does not get affected.
Isolated is not working in cbq. And no, there is no such option in htb.
> Is there an irc channel for lartc discussions?
Yes, #lartc @ irc.oftc.net. But you have to be lucky to find someone not-away
:)
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
