On Tuesday 02 September 2003 07:39, Nimit Gupta wrote:
Hello,
Thanks a lot Martin & Stef for clarifying my doubts. Your detailed explaination was quiet helpful in making the things clear.
I agree that if I give 24Kbit for each leaf class they will get it without confirming about the total bandwidth available with the parent but why does it allow him to reach upto 48Kbit even when ceiling is 24Kbit?
Is this his for a short term, like a burst?
Yeah its for a short period but it keeps happening, I mean it will reach to 48Kbit and then after few sec it will stablize at 24Kbit then again it will reach to 48 and this repeats.
can you explain how to calculate burst rates for better control and accuracy?
In order for you to control latency and bandwidth use, you must ensure that you are the slowest point. Annoyingly, the only successful way to identify exactly what speed to use as a bandwidth cap is experimentation. A good general suggestion is to lop off a couple of kbit and try capping your bandwidth exactly as Stef suggests. Try using 188kbit, and see if your apparent control increases.
Is there a ratio between the total available bandwidth and the amount you restrict it to or you can just arbitarily reduce by 5-7 Kbit.
It should be quite accurate. I tested it for different rates / ceils and each time the results where allmost perfect.
So I want to know what ratio it is as you said for 192Kbit make 188Kbit thats equivalent to 2 percent, is this the way.
One more thing, Is there something like isolated(as in cbq) in htb, that is irrespective of others demand the bandwidth allocated to someone as isolated does not get affected.
Is there an irc channel for lartc discussions?
with regards, Nimit
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
