On Tuesday 02 September 2003 07:39, Nimit Gupta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks a lot Martin & Stef for clarifying my doubts. Your detailed
> explaination was quiet helpful in making the things clear.
>
> I agree that if I give 24Kbit for each leaf class they will get it
> without confirming about the total bandwidth available with the parent
> but why does it allow him to reach upto 48Kbit even when ceiling is 24Kbit?
Is this his for a short term, like a burst?
> > In order for you to control
> > latency and bandwidth use, you must ensure that you are the slowest
> > point. Annoyingly, the only successful way to identify exactly what speed
> > to use as a bandwidth cap is experimentation. A good general suggestion
> > is to lop off a couple of kbit and try capping your bandwidth exactly as
> > Stef suggests. Try using 188kbit, and see if your apparent control
> > increases.
>
> Is there a ratio between the total available bandwidth and the amount
> you restrict it to or you can just arbitarily reduce by 5-7 Kbit.
It should be quite accurate. I tested it for different rates / ceils and each
time the results where allmost perfect.
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
