On Monday 21 April 2003 04:30, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Rio,
>
> : I give you real situation in my network:
> :
> : eth0[PUBLIC.IP]
> : LINUX - BW - Manager
> : eth1[192.168.1.10]
> :
> :
> : 4 hosts: 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.4
> :
> : My total bandwidth is only 128Kbit
> : All NICs are Realtek 10Mbit
> :
> : So the solution as you offered is to put each class 128Kbit/4 = 32Kbit?
> : If that so, then it would be good if i use CBQ qdisc, not HTB. I want to
> : use HTB because HTB burstable.
>
> I would suggest the following configuration (as Stef has proposed):
>
> 128kbit ceil 128kbit +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.1
>
> +---------------+---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.2
>
> +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.3
>
> +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.4
>
> Now, you have four different classes, one for each IP. Each IP is
> guaranteed 128kbit.
Each IP Is guaranteed 32 kbit, not 128 kbit.
> Each IP can consume up to 128kbit, if there isn't
> competition with other classes.
>
> You should use the qdisc with which you are most comfortable--both CBQ and
> HTB can do this for you. For reference, it seems that the experience on
> this list leans toward HTB, though.
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
