Re: RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Original Message:
-----------------
From: Martin A. Brown mabrown-lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I would suggest the following configuration (as Stef has proposed):
> 128kbit ceil 128kbit    +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.1
>         |               |
>         +---------------+---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.2
>                         |
>                         +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.3
>                         |
>                         +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.4
>Now, you have four different classes, one for each IP.  Each IP is
>guaranteed 128kbit.  Each IP can consume up to 128kbit, if there isn't
>competition with other classes.

Dear Martin,
I ve implemented before just exactly as you have described above, but the
main problem was when some host, 192.168.1.4 for example, use DAP that open
about 10 tcp streams, that host will get 128Kbit maximum when the other
hosts in idle connection. But as soon as other host up and request for
bandwidth, 192.168.1.4 wont decrease the speed of download into 32Kbit. I
wonder why this is happened ? 

Regards,
Rio Martin.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux