Re: [LARTC] Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:41:59AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> example, consider the not too uncommon example of a computer connected via 
> 100Mbps networking to a DSL modem, and you want to tune the use of the link 
> without needing to introduce a router inbetween.

Assuming there is only one computer (and therefore no need for the router),
why would you want something other than a work-conserving ingress policy?
Drop certain packets, allow everything else ...

I can almost see your point if we're discussing very slow computers, but
in that case the qdisc's would slow it down more -- could you please fill
me in on your assumptions here?
-- 
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd.     (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc)
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux