Re: [LARTC] more than 1 Line - but not with FreeS/WAN

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hello,

On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Whit Blauvelt wrote:

> Hi Julian,
>
> It looks like your patch is not compatible with FreeS/WAN's (1.92) patches.

	It is possible, I didn't tried.

> Or at least in trying to compile a 2.2.20 kernel, it works fine with yours,
> but then adding FreeS/WAN leads to errors. Word has it that FreeS/WAN 1.92
> normally works with 2.2.20, but haven't verified that by experiment. Guess
> it makes sense that you'd both be getting into some of the same sections of
> kernel code.
>
> I'm not saying this is something you should fix - I'm not all that impressed
> with FreeS/WAN as an implementation (actually the commercial IPSec
> implementations I've tested are also pretty flakey - hope that protocol
> grows up some day). Just wanted to note to folks that there seems to be an
> incompatibility here. In the long run, encrypted communications and good
> redundant routing are both vital services.

	OK, I'll try in the next days to see what is the issue.

> Whit
> @transpect.com

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux