Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/4] Introduce a C++ wrapper for the kvm APIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/24/2010 07:17 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
>  Anyone wishing to implement this interface is forced to implement read
>  and write methods (callbacks) with exactly the right signature.  The
>  compiler will complain if they don't.  So if File is a good interface,
>  we can make the compiler force people to use it correctly.
>
>  We can emulate this in C with ->ops->  things, but that's just
>  boilerplate and more places for people to get things wrong, or lazy and
>  take shortcuts.

In the mean time we spend our time debugging the runtime because the
virtual functions don't behave as expected. In C we know what is going
on, in C++ it is pray and hope.

That is pure bullshit. All major browsers are written in C++, all major office suites, one leading free desktop, google, countless other projects. There is a lot more C++ code in the world than C code. If virtual functions didn't behave as expected, surely we'd hear by now.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux