Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/4] Introduce a C++ wrapper for the kvm APIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/24/10 18:11, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 07:06 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Sorry but that is utterly and completely bogus! The enforcement is only
>> as good as the developers and maintainers make it,
> 
>   class File {
>   public:
>       virtual ~File() {}
>       virtual void read(...) = 0;
>       virtual void write(...) = 0;
>   };
> 
> Anyone wishing to implement this interface is forced to implement read
> and write methods (callbacks) with exactly the right signature.  The
> compiler will complain if they don't.  So if File is a good interface,
> we can make the compiler force people to use it correctly.
> 
> We can emulate this in C with ->ops-> things, but that's just
> boilerplate and more places for people to get things wrong, or lazy and
> take shortcuts.

In the mean time we spend our time debugging the runtime because the
virtual functions don't behave as expected. In C we know what is going
on, in C++ it is pray and hope.

Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux