On Wed, Nov 06, 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:17:38AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > I do subscribe to kvm@, but it's a mailing list, not at alias like x86@. AFAIK, > > x86@ is unique in that regard. In other words, I don't see a need to document > > the kvm@ behavior, because that's the behavior for every L: entry in MAINTAINERS > > except the few "L: x86@xxxxxxxxxx" cases. > > I have had maintainers in the past not like to be CCed directly as long as the > corresponding mailing list is CCed. LOL, doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of MAINTAINERS?
