Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Adjust SRSO mitigation to new features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 11:18:16AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> It gets there, usually (as evidenced by my response).  But even for me, there's
> a non-zero chance I'll miss something that's only Cc'd to kvm@, largely because
> kvm@ is used by all things virt, i.e. it's a bit noisy:
> 
> $ git grep kvm@ MAINTAINERS | wc -l
> 29

Hm, ok, so what do you guys prefer to be CCed on? Everyone from
get_maintainer.pl's output? commit signers, authors, everyone? Or?

> Heh, I found that.  Not very helpful.
> 
> If you can't document the specifics, can you at least describe the performance
> implications?  It's practically impossible to give meaningful feedback without
> having any idea what the magic bit does.

Lemme see what I can get clearance on...

Stay tuned.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux