On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:17:38AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > I do subscribe to kvm@, but it's a mailing list, not at alias like x86@. AFAIK, > x86@ is unique in that regard. In other words, I don't see a need to document > the kvm@ behavior, because that's the behavior for every L: entry in MAINTAINERS > except the few "L: x86@xxxxxxxxxx" cases. I have had maintainers in the past not like to be CCed directly as long as the corresponding mailing list is CCed. You guys want to be CCed. I will try to remember that. We have different trees, with different requirements, wishes, idiosyncrasies and so on. And you know that very well. So document it or not - your call. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette