On Wed, Nov 06, 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 07:35:15AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > You didn't though. The original mail Cc'd kvm@, but neither Paolo nor I. > > I think we established that tho - I didn't know that kvm@ doesn't CC you guys. I do subscribe to kvm@, but it's a mailing list, not at alias like x86@. AFAIK, x86@ is unique in that regard. In other words, I don't see a need to document the kvm@ behavior, because that's the behavior for every L: entry in MAINTAINERS except the few "L: x86@xxxxxxxxxx" cases.
