On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 1:05 PM James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Of course we could start changing linux-svsm to support the same > > goals, but I think the end result will not be very different from > > what COCONUT looks now. > > That's entirely possible, so what are the chances of combining the > projects now so we don't get a split in community effort? Very cool to see this announcement and read the discussion! One SVSM will be better for Google too. Specifically: - One hypervisor/SVSM startup sequence is easier for us to get working - One SVSM is easier to test/qualify/deploy - Generally speaking, things will be easier for us if all SNP VMs start running off of the same "first mutable code". I.e., the same SVSM, UEFI, etc.
