On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:44 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 07:26:32PM +0000, Kalra, Ashish wrote: > > Yes that’s what I mentioned to Boris. > > Right, and as far as I'm concerned, the x86 bits look ok to me and I'm > fine with this going through the kvm tree. > > There will be a conflict with this: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928191009.32551-1-bp@xxxxxxxxx > > resulting in: > > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c: In function ‘setup_efi_kvm_sev_migration’: > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:563:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sev_active’; did you mean ‘cpu_active’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 563 | if (!sev_active() || > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > | cpu_active > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:277: arch/x86/kernel/kvm.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:540: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:1868: arch/x86] Error 2 > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > but Paolo and I will figure out what to do - I'll likely have a separate > branch out which he can merge and that sev_active() will need to be > converted to > > if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) > > which is trivial. > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette Hey All, Bumping this thread again, since I believe these patches are good to go. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help here, Thanks, Steve
