On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:54 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:10:08PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote: > > Then isn't it cleaner to simply do it via the paravirt_ops interface, > > i.e, pv_ops.mmu.notify_page_enc_status_changed() where the callback > > is only set when SEV and live migration feature are supported and > > invoked through early_set_memory_decrypted()/encrypted(). > > > > Another memory encryption platform can set it's callback accordingly. > > Yeah, that sounds even cleaner to me. If I'm not mistaken, this is what the patch set does now?