On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 07:26:32PM +0000, Kalra, Ashish wrote: > Yes that’s what I mentioned to Boris. Right, and as far as I'm concerned, the x86 bits look ok to me and I'm fine with this going through the kvm tree. There will be a conflict with this: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928191009.32551-1-bp@xxxxxxxxx resulting in: arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c: In function ‘setup_efi_kvm_sev_migration’: arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:563:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sev_active’; did you mean ‘cpu_active’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 563 | if (!sev_active() || | ^~~~~~~~~~ | cpu_active cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:277: arch/x86/kernel/kvm.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:540: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:1868: arch/x86] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... but Paolo and I will figure out what to do - I'll likely have a separate branch out which he can merge and that sev_active() will need to be converted to if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) which is trivial. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
