On 08/17/2009 06:09 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specific
differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear
(and steal) them though.
You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh?
If I've offended you, I apologize.
Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it
apparently falls on deaf ears.
Well, I'm sorry, I truly don't think I've had that question answered
with specificity. I'm really interested in it (out of a selfish desire
to improve virtio), but the only comment I recall from you was to the
effect that the virtio rings were better than ioq in terms of cache
placement.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
