* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This will generally be used for hypervisors to publish any host-side > virtual devices up to a guest. The guest will have the opportunity > to consume any devices present on the vbus-proxy as if they were > platform devices, similar to existing buses like PCI. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ > arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/Makefile | 1 > drivers/vbus/Kconfig | 14 ++++ > drivers/vbus/Makefile | 3 + > drivers/vbus/bus-proxy.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/vbus_driver.h | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 7 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/vbus/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/vbus/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/vbus/bus-proxy.c > create mode 100644 include/linux/vbus_driver.h Is there a consensus on this with the KVM folks? (i've added the KVM list to the Cc:) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
