On 08/15/2009 01:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
This will generally be used for hypervisors to publish any host-side
virtual devices up to a guest. The guest will have the opportunity
to consume any devices present on the vbus-proxy as if they were
platform devices, similar to existing buses like PCI.
Is there a consensus on this with the KVM folks? (i've added the KVM
list to the Cc:)
My opinion is that this is a duplication of effort and we'd be better
off if everyone contributed to enhancing virtio, which already has
widely deployed guest drivers and non-Linux guest support.
It may have merit if it is proven that it is technically superior to
virtio (and I don't mean some benchmark in some point in time; I mean
design wise). So far I haven't seen any indications that it is.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
