Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/17/2009 05:16 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: >>> My opinion is that this is a duplication of effort and we'd be better >>> off if everyone contributed to enhancing virtio, which already has >>> widely deployed guest drivers and non-Linux guest support. >>> >>> It may have merit if it is proven that it is technically superior to >>> virtio (and I don't mean some benchmark in some point in time; I mean >>> design wise). So far I haven't seen any indications that it is. >>> >>> >> >> The design is very different, so hopefully I can start to convince you >> why it might be interesting. >> > > We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specific > differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear > (and steal) them though. > You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh? Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it apparently falls on deaf ears. -Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
