Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] Utilize the vmx preemption timer for tsc deadline timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-05-24 6:58 GMT+08:00 yunhong jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, 22 May 2016 08:21:50 +0800
> Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2016-05-21 6:06 GMT+08:00 Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> >> On Behalf Of Paolo Bonzini
>> >> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 3:34 AM
>> >> To: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> >> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] Utilize the vmx preemption timer for
>> >> tsc deadline timer
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 20/05/2016 03:45, Yunhong Jiang wrote:
>> >> > From: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >
>> >> > Utilizing the VMX preemption timer for tsc deadline timer
>> >> > virtualization. The VMX preemption timer is armed when the vCPU
>> >> > is running, and a VMExit will happen if the virtual TSC deadline
>> >> > timer expires.
>> >> >
>> >> > When the vCPU thread is scheduled out, the tsc deadline timer
>> >> > virtualization will be switched to use the current solution,
>> >> > i.e. use the timer for it. It's switched back to VMX preemption
>> >> > timer when the vCPU thread is scheduled int.
>> >> >
>> >> > This solution avoids the complex OS's hrtimer system, and also
>> >> > the host timer interrupt handling cost, with a preemption_timer
>> >> > VMexit. It fits well for some NFV usage scenario, when the vCPU
>> >> > is bound to a pCPU and the pCPU is isolated, or some similar
>> >> > scenario.
>> >> >
>> >> > However, it possibly has impact if the vCPU thread is scheduled
>> >> > in/out very frequently, because it switches from/to the hrtimer
>> >> > emulation a lot.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 108
>> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> >> >  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h |  10 +++++
>> >> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c   |  26 +++++++++++++
>> >> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c   |   6 +++
>> >> >  4 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> >> > index 5776473be362..a613bcfda59a 100644
>> >> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> >> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> >> > @@ -6608,6 +6608,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu
>> >> *vcpu)
>> >> >
>> >> >     local_irq_disable();
>> >> >
>> >> > +   inject_expired_hwemul_timer(vcpu);
>> >>
>> >> Is this really fast enough (and does it trigger often enough) that
>> >> it is worth slowing down all vmenters?
>> >>
>> >> I'd rather call inject_expired_hwemul_timer from the preemption
>> >> timer vmexit handler instead.  inject_pending_hwemul_timer will
>> >> set the preemption timer countdown to zero if the deadline of the
>> >> guest LAPIC timer has passed already.  This should be relatively
>> >> rare.
>> >
>> > Sure and will take this way on the new patch set. I'd give some
>> > reson why it's this way now. Originally this patch was for
>> > cyclictest on guest with latency less than 15us for 24 hours. So,
>> > if the timer expires already before VM entry, we try to inject it
>> > immediately, instead of waiting for an extra VMExit, which may be
>> > 4~5 us.
>>
>> inject_expired_hwemul_timer() just set the pending bit, and still need
>> a vmexit to final exit to vcpu_run() which is the only place to check
>> pending and inject APIC_LVTT, so why add inject_expired_hwemul_timer()
>> in vcpu_enter_guest() can avoid an extra vmexit?
>
> The inject_expired_hwemul_timer() will invoke the kvm_make_request(), which
> will cause the kvm try to inject the timer interrupt directly. Please notice
> the vcpu_enter_guest() will recheck the requests late.

Actually I did't find another place inject pending timer irqs except
in vcpu_run, though kvm_set_pending_timer mention that there is
implicitly checked in vcpu_enter_guest.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux